Wednesday, February 18, 2009

A COUPLE OF THINGS OUR LEADERS NEED TO KNOW

Things don't change much in our make-believe 'liberal-democratic' societies - in the guise of freedom the same tyrannies and idiocies go on, as our leaders and establishment eunuchs continue to act as slaves to politically-correct insanities even as proof of divergent opinion exists but is drowned out.

This applies to feminist ideology but also to the enshrinement of Israel in Western establishment opinion as morally sacrosanct, where the lobbying of Zionists drowns out the protest of dissenting Jews. Here is a letter from a dissident Canadian Jewish woman on 'Israeli apartheid':

From: Judy Haiven
Date: Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:23 PM
Subject: [IJV-SC] SAIA Anti-Apartheid week and Your censorship of it

Dear President Roseann Runte,

I am a Jewish- Canadian and an academic. I belong to Independent
Jewish Voices which is a cross-Canada Jewish organisation which is
against Israel's illegal and brutal occupation of the West Bank and
Gaza; we also support Palestinian human rights.

I was horrified to read that you and the Provost banned and
confiscated Students Against Israeli Apartheid (SAIA) posters at
Carleton University. These posters announced Isareli Apartheid Week.
Whatever you personally might think of Israeli Apartheid, respected
international figures such as Reverend Desmond Tutu and Jimmy Carter
have named it outright and condemned it.

While I, as a Jew, once had qualms about using the term Israeli
Apartheid --I no longer do. This is because especially since Israel's
last war on Gaza mere weeks ago, it has been clear to me and the broad
international community that Israel's deadly attacks were targetted at
defenceless civilians; that Israel destroyed Gaza and its
infrastructure; that Israel killed 1400 people, horribly maimed about
4,000 (a third of the killed and maimed were children) and
deliberately made 9,000 Palestinians homeless. Israel also used
chemical bombs on Palestinians. These are admitted matters of fact,
not fiction.

I am not the source for these reports however the Red Cross, Amnesty
International, Human Rights Watch and B'Tselem (the Israeli
Information Centre for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories) have
all agreed these murders and maimings and chemical bombings happened,
and that Israel was solely responsible for them.

So it seems Jewish students, or organisations such as the Canadian
Jewish Congress complained about the cartoon on the posters. I
understood they did not like the fact that the fighter aircraft is
about to drop a bomb on a Palestinian child holding a teddy bear. Well
sorry. This just happened IN REALITY, one month ago. Hundreds of
children died and more were terribly maimed and burned. While Israel
can certainly dish it out, Israel cannot "take it." Whenever there is
the slightest criticism of Israel -- its representatives in Canada --
namely the mainstream Jewish Congress or B'nai B'rith -- scream
unfair and demand to close down opposition. Israel's supporters insist
only they have the right to "frame" what is going on. And
unfortunately you -- as the President and the Provost -- fell into the
trap laid by Israel's supporters.

It is very important for students, faculty and the Canadian public to
know the truth about what is going on in Israel and Palestine. These
posters help increase awareness of what Israel is doing "on the
ground."

I think you owe SAIA an apology and should return their leaflets.
Their campaign is vital to human rights in Palestine and Israel and
the world over. Don't censor them.

--
Judy Haiven, PhD
Associate Professor
Department of Management
Saint Mary's University
Halifax, NS
Canada B3H 3C3

tel: 902-491-8650
fax: 902-420-5119
home: 902-429-8868
email: jhaiven@smu.ca

Monday, February 9, 2009

RAW MILK CONTROVERSY - SYMPTOM OF FOOD INDUSTRY CORRUPTION

The prosecution and persecution of Newmarket raw milk vendor Michael Schmidt is symptomatic of long-standing corruption in the gigantic food industry of North America. This should be the argument he makes in his defence, but it is perhaps too big for him to make.

While there are those in the health food industry who are not enthusiastic about milk (raw or not), insisting it is meant for calves (offspring of cows), they are more or less unanimous in declaring that pasteurized milk is useless and may well be harmful.

But that hasn't stopped our authorities from making 'an example' of Schmidt. In the USA the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has moved to pasteurize almonds and peanuts! Simply because a few cases of salmonella occurred, the entire supply of almonds is to be pasteurized - i.e. stripped of its nutritional content - the nutritional equivalent of throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

But this is of course the tip of the iceberg...... the FDA has cooperated for decades with giant food companies to inflict millions of North Americans with foods rich in refined flour and sugar (eg. those cereals to be had with pasteurized milk by kids every morning), from which the natural food content was removed and replaced with dangerous preservative chemicals. Canned foods similarly rich in chemicals and containing less than 10% nutrients have been another slow poison the FDA was content to let live and prosper. Others have written about the way cattle have been fed corn and bovine growth hormone to make them as fat and large as quickly as possible, and how the denial of grass to cattle may well have caused mad cow disease.

The high levels of diabetes, heart disease and cancer in North America surely flow from the refined and processed food supply, which has made mega-billions for giant food companies.

It took decades for the tobacco industry to be held accountable - but at least they were forced to put warning labels on cigarette cases. When are warning labels going to appear on food products - eg. "This product contains chemicals which could damage your health, and most of the nutrients have been removed"?

When will this corruption and insanity stop? Are we slaves to corporate America?

Saturday, February 7, 2009

REVOLUTIONARY ROAD

Another riveting movie - in which the tension never lets up - as powerful an indictment of American life as Written On The Wind and American Beauty were. Dissects the deep angst, loneliness and desperation that lay beneath the superficial 'American Dream' so extravagantly sold by American culture and the happy-go-lucky movies of Gene Kelly and Fred Astaire.

Friday, February 6, 2009

GRAN TORINO

America will never acknowledge, let alone apologize for, its war-crimes against Korea. The protective umbrella provided by UN approval of the 1950s invasion makes that a non-starter.

Clint Eastwood however does so, kind of - in his latest movie Gran Torino. However unlike his Iwo Jima duet - in which he exposed the blatant propaganda trick that was the famous picture of 'glory' being planted by US marines on a hill on that island (a picture which was taken a month before the island was actually captured) in Flags of Our Fathers, and then in Letters from Iwo Jima presented the human side of the Japanese trapped on that island against overpowering attack by American forces and airpower - this time he presents a fictional fable.

An expose based on history would be almost impossible given the protective 'cover' of the UN sanction for the largely American invasion which killed millions of North Koreans.

So he paints a fictional tale set in modern-day America, with a melting pot now including Koreans and Cambodian Hmongs, in which he himself plays an octogenarian Korean war veteran and widower, apparently racist and misogynist (though not in the distorted feminist sense of that word). The plot includes critiques of the dysfunctional 'nuclear' American family, trashy morals of modern-day kids, the lonely plight of senior citizens, the danger of street gangs and guns, and the futility of ecclesiastical confession. Politically-incorrect racist words like 'gook' and 'mick' are frequently used and serve to underline the present-day hypocrisy of attacking 'slurs' .....when it is actions that count....The most harmful and malicious racists use politically correct language - something like the difference between a bark and a bite.

It would be easy to dismiss this film as a mishmash 'masala' of ideas lifted from The Karate Kid and Boyz'N the Hood with a little Rain Man thrown in, but nonetheless the sum somehow exceeds the parts, as amidst all this emerges a quite wonderful paean of love and a moving fairy-tale of repentance and sacrifice.

Quite possibly the finest thing Eastwood has done.

Thursday, January 29, 2009

THE UNTOUCHABLE STATUS OF JEWRY

SENT TO THE SUN AND THE STAR

Jews have been the victims of centuries-old persecution by peoples imagining themselves Christian but who were the exact opposite of what the 'Son of Man' taught. Priests and some Popes over the centuries encouraged this victimization, and if the Son of Man had been alive during these events, it is hard to see how such priests and Popes (and those untold millions following their wicked preachings) would not have been labelled 'hypocrites', murderers, and 'sons of the devil' by that Son. This persecution of Jewry reached its zenith under Nazism.

It is important however to place this persecution in perspective. Jews have now acquired a seemingly 'untouchable' status as no one in our Western establishment seems willing to tolerate any criticism of Jewish behavior. The 'holocaust' is one such untouchable subject and anyone who does not join in the lament is denounced as an 'holocaust-denier'.

But the Jewish holocaust is far from the only one – it is not even the most horrendous one. History contains far worse holocausts and genocides which are effectively being 'denied' by the mainstream Western establishment in their zeal to prove their loyalty to Jewish memory.

During the Second World War in which some six million Jews were killed by Nazis, some 27 million Soviets perished as well, bearing the brunt of the terrible Nazi war-machine, while the Western Allies watched and waited, before launching D-Day to finish off the mortally wounded Nazi behemoth.

Going back further, even greater holocausts took place in North and South America. According to the Oscar-winning film 'Barbarian Invasions' (directed by Canada's Denys Arcand) some 50 million natives were murdered in North America and three times as many in South America. In the latter case this mind-boggling genocide took place without modern 'weapons of mass destruction', and with the complicity of the Roman Catholic Church. (More reliable sources such as the writings of Ronald Wright attribute most of the latter genocide to diseases (smallpox, flu, measles, etc.) brought to Latin America by the Europeans.... a kind of unwitting biological warfare.)

In the recent news flaps involving the Wiesenthal Center's denunciation of the current Pope for reinstating an alleged holocaust-denying priest, and others involving denunciations of dissident columnists who have compared Israel's actions in Gaza and others prior to it to those of the Nazis, we need to remember that the Jews have not been the only victims of human cruelty and insanity. They have not even been the worst victims.

And in any event, what was done to Jews by the Nazis does not justify their theft of Palestinian land and the use of American-supported force to deny the 'legitimate rights of the Palestinian people', who none of the 'right people' in the Western establishment seem to care about.

Israel's treatment of the Palestinians who they evicted from their homeland is an obscenity, and that central fact should not be forgotten in the Jewish lobbying and denunciations of anyone who dares criticize Israeli actions in the Middle East. If 'Yahweh' promised the Jews some miles of burning desert, He conned them, for those few miles are not the 'promised land'. And they have violated all His commandments in their armed robbery and occupation of the 'Holy Land'.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

LETTER TO THE POST - THE RIGHT TO NOT SUPPORT

THE RIGHT TO NOT SUPPORT

Mr. Gunter's editorial critiquing the Ontario Superior Court judgment in the Pasqualino Cornelio case ordering him to continue paying child support to his ex-wife for twin girls fathered by someone else without Mr. Cornelio's knowledge makes the right argument, but too timidly. Mr. Gunter also avoids the major under-currents of Canadian society of which family law is but one part....it is not just in the arena of family law that 'logic is distorted'. And the problem goes far beyond 'distorted logic' to a almost inexorable bias against men in many aspects of society where 'logic' fairness and justice have been aborted to appease extreme male-hating feminist ideology.

Mr. Gunter avoids this 'dangerous' subject to make his article politically palatable. This is understandable, although he does refer to the 'hue and cry' that would occur if a woman were 'press-ganged' by a judge to pay a father child support for children out of wedlock....

Mr. Gunter for example, dilutes his argument by ending his article by saying a man who did not support children fathered by another, would be a 'heel'. But he does not say what a woman who commits adultery and has kids out of wedlock, in flagrant deceit of marital vows, would be.........surely even prostitutes behave more morally, and contractually?

The problem in our post-feminist society is that 'the woman is always right'. Women are never guilty of misconduct – if they 'maliciously' wound their husbands, it is because they are suffering from 'battered woman's syndrome'; if they manufacture allegations of sexual abuse against their ex-husbands to have custody denied to them, that is of no consequence; if they manufacture allegations of rape or sexual harassment, that is simply 'mischief'; if a wife is sleeping with someone else, surely that is the husband's failure to keep her happy and satisfied.........men are only 'deadbeats', wallets...moneybags, who have no moral qualities as they only want 'one thing'.... they are therefore to be presumed guilty as charged, no evidence necessary. The heinous and automatic guilt of men necessitates draconian laws and medieval policies such as 'zero tolerance'.

There are never any consequences for female students who destroy the careers of male teachers with false allegations......in domestic disputes, it is always the man who must be charged with a crime, never the woman.....in a rape case, a woman's previous sexual history cannot now be discussed......no is always no to our idiot system, even though any fool knows that no is usually only a woman's first position, to immediately gain and maintain the upper hand in sexual negotiations, and be changed as the situation dictates, for women must not appear 'easy', or forward.....Women are always the prey, never the pursuers...they never lust, only love...they never use their 'pussy-power' to extract, even extort, the maximum price (emotional and financial) from men....no..they are too kind and loving for that.....The tommyrot just does not end.....but in the Land of the Eunuch, the Home of the John Bobbitt, tommyrot is official policy.

These matters constitute more than 'distorted logic' – they amount to systematic (and quite hideous) corruption by a system that has sold out men to feminist ideology, and idiotology. Some decades ago, an early feminist wrote of the 'female eunuch'......we are long now into an era where male eunuchs and John Bobbitts abound.

Sunday, December 28, 2008

NO DOUBT ABOUT 'DOUBT'

Doubt is undoubtedly one of the finest motion pictures playing today. In 2 mesmerizing performances - Philip Seymour Hoffman as the unjustly accused priest whose very compassion for the underdog makes him a target, and Meryl Streep as the hateful CUNT accusing him, supremely certain of her case, and willing to 'step away from God' (i.e. lie and fabricate evidence) to 'fight wrongdoing' - the movie (even though set in 1964 Boston) shows the hideously corrupt society we live in today, where modern-day 'witches' with mouths more toxic than their anuses, spewing venom that destroys lives and reputations, run amok - with the eunuchs and John Bobbitts of our male establishment not only unwilling to counter them, but often conniving with such evil in order to prove their 'political correctness'.

In olden days witches were burned at the stake, sometimes even innocent ones. Today too many guilty 'witches' are being left untouched...