The flogging of Djokovic and other disturbing questions

Since the onset of the current pandemic, many disturbing questions about it have been suppressed, either covertly or overtly. Chief among them was the banning of David Icke, a self-described 'conspiracy theorist' - from youtube and facebook - for his claims that there is no certain virus definition (hence the burning of some 5G towers), that statistics of deaths are being manipulated (with co-morbidities falsely attributed to the coronavirus), and the presumed intent by billionaires like Bill Gates (who is now the largest funder of W.H.O.) to plant nano-chips in vaccines which are likely to become mandatory or carry consequences for those who resist (like restrictions on travel). That nanoparticles are being researched for use in vaccines and nano-medicine is an open secret, easily googled, with benefits such as new limbs, repairing damaged nerves etc. being positive possibilities. But none of this is openly stated. The WTA, including Canada's Eugenie Bouchard, mocked Novak Djokovic since his Adria tournoi (done without distancing), resulted in him and others testing positive. What is not mentioned is whether Novak or any other affected person, such as his coach Ivanesivic, actually suffer any symptoms post diagnosis. Isn't that a relevant question? Yes theoretically these people could 'infect' others.... but if most of those others suffer no symptoms, is there harm or benefit? The only way to acquire immunity is exposure - either direct infection or through vaccine. We are told without vaccination the death count would be vastly greater. But therein lies the dilemma..... should the focus be on natural herd immunity, or dependency on Big Pharma vaccines? The Gates foundation openly prefers the latter, and has a record of pressuring the poorest in Africa to serve as guinea pigs, with some disastrous consequences. But the billionaire's wealth and current neo-liberal corruption is likely to protect him from consequences, both civil and criminal. And the as yet undiscussed $6.4 trillion dollar question, and potentially a $64 trillion dollar question if pandemics (real or manipulated) become a future trend - is why is a set of private, undisclosed hyper-rich bankers (called banksters by former Canadian Clerk of the Privy Council Paul Hellyer) - have the license to create from thin (if polluted) air, these trillions of dollars being 'borrowed' by governments around the world? Almost certainly they include the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers.... And why should citizens, including Canadians - have to pay back such fictitious money - through vastly increased taxes or slashed programs? Isn't this just another grotesque and monstrous money grab by the hyper-rich, from the 99%?

LETTER TO THE NEW YORK TIMES RE KASHMIR

Your op-ed presents a biased picture of history as it recommends the UN get involved. The history is that at the time of independence in 1947, Kashmir was ruled by a Hindu. Under the British administration of the partition, princely states could opt to join India or Pakistan. As the Hindu ruler demurred, forces from Pakistan 'surged into Kashmir', and took by force what is now called POK - Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir. This illegal seizure induced Kashmir's ruler to sign to join India. That obviously included the portion seized by Pakistanis. The Indian Army was capable of repulsing this invasion and reclaiming by force what is now POK. But in view of Gandhi's beliefs on non-violence, and that India and Pakistan were 2 limbs of the same body, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru (himself a Kashmiri Pandit) ordered the army to desist. A line of control developed (LOC). Arguably, the Indian army can still take POK, although now the situation is far more calamitous, with nuclear weapons on both sides. Having grabbed a third or more of Kashmir by force, Pakistan never stopped trying to seize the rest by force. Wars in 1967, 1971, and 1999 followed. Pakistan's own massive crimes against what was East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) include the murder of millions using weapons supplied illegally by the US via Iran's SAVAK and Saudi Arabia. This led to Bangladesh's independence as India had no choice but to intervene as millions of East Pakistani refugees flowed into West Bengal. This was a by-product of the 1971 war. Having failed to grab Kashmir though open wars, Pakistan switched to supporting terrorist acts both in India-controlled Kashmir (ICK) and in India. The history of murderous bombings in Indian cities is well established, including with what is called 26/11 in India - the attacks on the Taj and Sheraton hotels and the train station formerly called Victoria terminus, in Mumbai. In all of this of course, there was a direct line to the fanatic jihadists installed in Afghanistan, trained under ISI auspices, by the CIA, to oust the USSR, which (if Zbigniew Breszinski is to be believed) was lured in by an American coup in Kabul (removing a Soviet-friendly government) to 'give the Soviets their own Vietnam'. So this is a more complete history than what you have written. Then there is the case that Pakistan itself has committed human rights abuses in POK. The hysterics of PM Imran Khan ever since India moved to integrate ICK into the Indian federation, show clearly the continued lust for territory of Pakistan. The claim on Kashmir by Pakistan is based on the fact that a majority of ICK residents are Muslim. That does not amount to a legitimate argument, as India has more Muslims than all of Pakistan. And Pakistan's history of treating Muslims who moved there from India during partition is a poor one - they are called 'mohajirs' (refugees) - decades after the partition, and subjected to open discrimination. All things considered, Pakistan does not have any legal rights to the Kashmir that has been part of India since 1947.

FALSE FLAG OP IN THE STRAITS OF HORMUZ

The US, joined by its usual ally the UK, and invisibly by its partner Israelin all anti-Iran matters, has immediately accused Iran of attacking 2 tankers in the Hormuz Straits off the coast of Iran, where it had already sent an aircraft carrier. The immediacy of such accusations, backed by 'intel', should be viewed with great skepticism. The US has a history of such 'false-flag' operations, including Operation Northwoods (which was not carried out but replaced with other actions against Cuba), the Gulf of Tonkin incident with which it gave itself the pretext to attack North Vietnam (after already having drenched South Vietnam with Agent Orange), and more recently the Weapons of Mass Deception used to attack Iraq in 2003, following 9/11 which half-a-dozen books by Professor David Ray Griffin and others including Christopher Bollyn allege was unquestionably an 'inside job'; the 'incontrovertible' evidence of which has been dismissed as conspiracy theory, while the official US government theory that 19 Arabs successfully conspired to smash the security systems of the world's sole superpower blankets any open discussion of the 'real' facts. The ultra-right wing neo-cons of the W. Bush administration had discussed in their long-planned 'Project for a New American Century' or PNAC, the need for a 'catalyzing event', a 'New Pearl Harbour', to accelerate their plans to re-arrange the oil-rich Middle East, consonantly with the Israeli 'Oded Yinon' plan to create a 'Greater Israel' comprising chunks of smashed Muslim countries, that supposedly existed thousands of years ago according to the Old Testament. Iran, being the strongest of the ME countries, was the last target on the list, and its invasion has been delayed by the insurgency in Iraq which has cost the US trillions of dollars, which made 'boots on the ground' invasions of Libya and Syria (also abetted by Russia) impractical. That the US position is loaded with duplicity is also demonstrated by the fact that under Trump the US has broken a US-negotiated deal with broad international support including Europe and Russia, by which Iran was curtailing its nuclear activities in exchange for easing of US-imposed sanctions. Iran accepted this deal notwithstanding the fact that Israel is allowed to keep more than 100 nuclear weapons with not a word of Western protest, but rather massive support of every kind - financial, diplomatic, technological and military - by the US. The best option for Iran, and the most logical one, is to re-commence nuclear development. Its leaders have been painted as reactionary and unstable and impossible to trust with a nuclear bomb by the US and Israel for the plain and obvious reason that a bomb would neutralize much of US-Israeli threats and plans against Iran. Like the smaller and weaker North Korea, Iran would acquire a far more effective 'defense' against its enemies. A slightly older review of history, brazenly suppressed by Western media, is that Iran was the US's #1 ally in the ME between 1953 and 1979. 1953 was when the US and UK supported a coup d'etat in Iran, toppling a democrat and installing a puppet dictator (the Shah) who terrorized, tortured and killed thousands of Iranians, while having breakfasts flown in from Paris on the Concorde as his wife took baths in tubs of milk, while the population suffered as the pitiful oil revenues went to buying US weapons. Kissinger used his considerable influence to pressure US universities including MIT, to accept Iranians into nuclear engineering programs. But all that changed when the Iranians kicked out the Shah in 1979, when Iran went overnight from being US ally # 1 in the region to US enemy # 1. A war with Iran will continue the genocide of millions of Middle-Eastern Muslims, by an increasingly stretched and desperate superpower, anxious to keep its hands on the throttle.

PEELING THE LIES BEHIND NEO-LIBERAL ECONOMICS - THE MINIMUM WAGE ISSUE

The last few decades have been called the age of neo-liberal economics. Following the 'Powell memorandum', these policies have been implemented with a progressive takeover by big business and the super rich who own them, of public institutions - political parties, the media, the academy, major chunks of the judiciary, and so on, at the cost of decimated unions whose power was stripped away with technological changes that enabled off-shoring of manufacturing to places where labour cost 'peanuts'. The so-called 'free trade agreements' progressively (or rather regressively) turned corporations into Masters, nation-states into Servants begging for investment, and liquidating their natural resources at bargain-basement prices. Kevin Taft (former Alberta politician) has written on how this process unfolded in Alberta (as one example), with the Peter Lougheed government being the last one to successfully negotiate reasonably fair terms for the province and its people. Key elements of the fraud that has been neo-liberalism have included tax cuts for the super-rich with promises of 'trickle-down' jobs and benefits, but as Arundhati Roy has put it, all that happened was a massive Gush-Up; by a recent estimate of some $30 trillion to the super-rich in the West, at the cost of a rapidly disappeared middle-class, transformed from what was once the 'proletariat' into what is now the 'precariat'. Other massive cons were privatization - trillion-dollar thefts creating billionaire oligarchies everywhere (because 'public' enterprises were simply 'inefficient'), and the 'deregulation' tsunami that produced the multi-trillion dollar subprime fraud which nearly wrecked the world's economy, but resulted in Zero CONSEQUENCES for the perpetrators in Wall Street, who remain TOO BIG TO JAIL. Thus Wall Street followed up the junk mortgage fraud of the early 2000s, with an even more brazen mortgage foreclosure fraud in 2010, with banks foreclosing on thousands of American homes with fraudulent documents filed in courts. Soldiers returning to the US from service in Iraq found their homes had been seized by banks.... One of the neo-liberal frauds is that higher wages destroy jobs. Well Big business... at least some representatives of it - 100 CEOs who include at least some big corporations - Facebook, Tesla - are finally clueing on that robbing the worker blind does not make for a sustainable economy. That's what the Ford company which made the Model T a century ago understood well - that paying its own workers well improved the market for its own products. Michael Hudson's book 'Killing the Host' talks about how decimating labour wages was the parasite (virus) killing its own host. During the 1950s and 60s, US labor enjoyed its highest prosperity, executive wages were only 10-15 times the worker's wage, and tax rates were incomparably higher for the rich. The US economy remained the dominant one, but prosperity was shared. Neo-liberal fraud has changed all that. But at least some businessmen are getting what Ontario Premier Doug Ford does not - that there are 2 sides to the minimum wage issue. Ostensibly, higher wages make it harder for business to pay for workers.... in the short run. But in the long run, higher wages mean more money spent by wage-earners on the products such businesses make or sell... Duh! 'Ontario is open for business again', says Doug. What he means is he wants Ontario to join the likes of states in the US South, where 'Right-to-Work' means to work for next to nothing, with no labor unions fighting for the workers' rights. Profits and executive compensation then can go sky-high. As Michael Moore shows in Fahrenheit 11/9, a young man working in construction rages about how he makes $7.30/hour in a Southern state; and gets 17 hours of work a week. This is what the US has done throughout Central and South America, destroying labour movements, arming and financing death squads to topple 'left-wing' governments that want to create a better life for their populations; assassinating labour, political, even Church leaders (priests) so that American transnational corporations can make higher profits, squeezing the life out of overseas economies, labour and nation-states. Well that ideology is now operating in the West, starting with the US. The parable of the frog and the scorpion is instructive here - even though the scorpion needs the frog to cross a stream, it stings the frog anyway, because that is its 'nature'. Those increasingly lower-paid workers in the US pay for the massive costs of the Pentagon, CIA, private mercenary/security armies like the former Blackwater, the 70,000 strong 'Special Operations' forces, etc which enforce the wishes of the gangsters of capitalism, in anywhere between 130 and 150 countries around the world at any given time, according to recent reports, naturally unpublicized in the major corporate-controlled media. The 99% who pay taxes (which the top 1% are more or less exempt from) carry the burden of the racketeers for the capitalists that make up the 0.01% who have benefited from decades of neo-liberal theft. Before the Powell memorandum the 0.01% were the principal beneficiaries of the international racketeering; now the racketeering has turned to the domestic populations of the West, through neo-liberal frauds. So at home (within the West) the frog is slowly being cooked so it doesn't realize what is happening. That minimum-wages destroy jobs is a lie; that tax-cuts for the rich create jobs is a lie; and that 'austerity' programs for countries which end up being 'loan-sharked' by the biggest sharks on the planet - the IMF, World Bank etc., are needed is also a lie. Bankers create loans from thin air.... then charge interest... then break bones of countries which cannot pay... usually because the money loaned went not to the country's population, but to crooked elites (the 1%) who lost it and the burden then fell, as is also usual - on the 99%. The 'greatest nation in history', also the richest on the planet and in history, has unlimited funds to pay for wars, weapons of mass murder, terror, torture and mass destruction, but is being driven bankrupt by socialist programs like medicare and Social Security. So the brainwashing goes. And as it goes in the US, so it slowly goes in other Western countries, through an inevitable process of osmosis, pushed through the international financial system. In short, Capitalism (the rule of the 1%) is Democracy, and Democracy (the wishes of the 99% or a majority of the 'un-brainwashed') is Communism.

The Kavanaugh mess; and why the 99% should watch Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 11/9

Aftermath of Kavanaugh 'victory'. A sickening mess. And why Michael Moore's latest film 'Fahrenheit 11/9' should be seen by all who care about democracy, the planet, human rights and justice. I realize I posted against allowing CBF's unsubstantiated and largely uncross-examined testimony to be allowed to derail the Kavanaugh nomination. But this has not led to a good result either. And this 'victory' is going to lead to a more intense fight in the upcoming mid-term elections. Both Republicans and Democrats will find reasons to fight harder in those elections; the R side to capitalize on their 'victory', and the D side to capture sufficient seats in Congress to be able to initiate impeachment proceedings against the new judge. So if that scenario plays out, women like CBF may find another chance to go after their target. So long as due process is followed, I have no problem. For me a Republican majority on the US Supreme Court is an obscenity. On this score I highly recommend Michael Moore's 'Fahrenheit 11/9', which I saw last night. This provides a frightening and good overview of the diseased system which produced Trump, and which long-experienced writers like Noam Chomsky predicted would produce a 'strong-man' figure like Trump. Moore asks the question 'HTF did this happen?' and then gives his own answer to it. Sometimes the answer produced queasiness in me, as it looked like bias, but once I saw the film to the end, Moore makes a compelling case. He covers a lot of bases: - aside from the distortions and lies and 'narcissism' that led to Trump's victory in 2016, he covers how decades of Democratic sell-out to the neo-liberal (big money) takeover of US politics starting with Bill Clinton made an 'outsider' like Trump possible. It was Bill Clinton who massively accelerated deregulation (like destroying the regulatory protections put in place after the Great Depression separating investment and commercial banking, which led inexorably to the multi-trillion dollar sub-prime mortgage fraud which nearly destroyed the world economy in 2008). - After Billy Boy Clinton came the W Bush administration, which Moore suggests caused 9/11 and the war-crimes that followed. David Ray Griffin's many books provide mountains of evidence to support this charge. - he shows unsettling videos of the Trump rallies at which African-Americans were insulted and kicked out from - at one Trump himself yells to one black man 'go home and get a job'. And of course those infamous comments about Mexican rapists and 'build a wall'. - he also covers the Flint poisoned water supply problem. Shows how racist, corrupt Michigan governor Rick Snyder ordered the building of an unnecessary pipeline (because a functioning one already existed) to supply Lake Michigan water to Flint, thus benefiting rich corporations. While the new one was being built, the old pipeline was shut down, and Flint's water-supply sourced from a lead-polluted Flint river. Thousands of black kids became poisoned for life ('irreversibly') with the Snyder administration doing nothing but deny and coverup. - when that poisoned water began to damage the parts produced in the sole GM plant in Flint, however, Snyder acted to re-route the pure Lake Michigan water, TO ONLY THE GM PLANT. Flint residents continued to drink poison. This led St. Obama to visit Flint, with tens of thousands of black residents overjoyed. - But all Obama did is at public meetings, to ask for 'a glass of water'; when people yelled out 'ask for a bottle of water', he insisted on a glass. Then he pretended to drink from it and asked for calm. The Flint residents, who wanted Obama to call in FEMA, Army engineers etc., to deal with this massive crisis, could only watch in disbelief as he betrayed them and later ordered a US army training exercise in that city, using the many abandoned buildings. Helicopters shot missiles into those buildings as Flint residents watched in fear, also having received no warning. Could there be a more revealing image of the cynical fraud that Obama was? Moore reveals that Goldman Sachs was the biggest contributor to St. Obama's campaigns; and of course overseas Obama murdered tens of thousands with drone strikes. - he discusses the only positive things that arose in response to this blatant neo-liberal destruction of the environment and democracy in the US. Teacher unions in Virginia successfully arising in revolt, and the students who organized huge rallies after the mass shooting in Florida. As he puts it - time is running out. With Trump in charge, only the worst can happen as climate catastrophe and corporate greed threaten the US and the planet. Of course, the corpo-Rats and the politicians, judges and media people in their pockets, make sure we stay ignorant - drunk or opiod addicted, or busy with sports, sitcoms, movies and such 'shit' so we barely have time to think, let alone act.

AFTER THE CURRENT KAVANAUGH V FORD TEMPEST

The current storm over the Kavanaugh nomination is over Ms. Ford's allegations, supported by womens' groups who also fear he would help overturn Roe v. Wade, and by African-Americans who believe he will help further disenfranchise them, including denying them the right to vote. Some groups have apparently been talking about rioting if this man is appointed to the US Supreme Court. Missing from this discussion is the great likelihood that even if his nomination is derailed, whoever might replace him would likely be as much a supporter of the ultra right-wing, neo-liberal inequality-advancing, and international war-mongering agenda of the Republican party. The substitute candidate would also be partisan - a key feature of the US Supreme Court for a long time. Hence there is likely to be little difference to the Republican dominated US Supreme Court - it would continue the same judicial policies regardless of who Trump appoints. The key problem is that 5 of the Supreme Court judges have been and will remain partisan loyalists of the Republican party, even if past appointees did not openly show the partisanship that Kavanaugh did in his pressure-filled Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. Until this Republican majority is turned into a minority, that court will function pretty much the same way. Under the court led by now deceased 'Chief Justice' Anton Scalia, those Republican judges carried out 2 of the greatest and most brazen attacks on democracy, a fact never mentioned in the nearly 2-years of hysterical outrage over the alleged Russian interference/attack on American democracy. Those attacks being the 2000 shutdown of the Florida recount which would have made Al Gore President, and the 2010 Citizens' United ruling (which really should be known as 'Billionaires and Corporations United against the 99%' if truth were told, having been substantially pushed by the Koch brothers who openly reject the notion that business has any responsibility to society or the environment). The 2000 attack on American democracy ushered in the people whom millions or tens of millions of people including Americans believe carried out 9/11, to provide the pretext (the 'New Pearl Harbour') for re-arranging the Middle East and taking greater control of its vast oil reserves in Muslim hands, and eventually assimilating giant chunks of smashed countries into a 'Greater Israel'; being the consonance of interests of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) and the Oded Yinon plan. Millions of Muslims murdered and tens of millions turned into refugees, with Iraq (location of the second largest oil reserves in the Middle East), Afghanistan (location of planned pipeline to transfer oil and gas from the Caspian Sea), Syria (location of another planned pipeline the Syrian leader rejects - hence he 'must go'), and Libya (whose leader wanted to sell his country's oil in a gold-backed African currency, deviating from the US Petrodollar which grants the single superpower its 'exorbitant privilege', and its ability to finance unlimited weapons of mass murder, terror, torture and destruction) among the countries destroyed or devastated. Matters proceeding substantially if not exactly as per plan. The set-up in 1991 of Saddam Hussein and Iraq (the US encouraging him to violently deal with Kuwait which was effectively stealing Iraqi oil from a 'disputed' oil well), was also motivated by his attempt to sell his country's oil in Euros - the same 'crime' Iran is guilty of. The US allegedly stands for 'free-market capitalism', except when other countries' attempts to be 'free' threatens American interests. The 2010 ruling authorizing unlimited campaign contributions by the super-rich and corporations, (while also paying lip-service to the vastly poorer unions' ability to do likewise) was a major contribution to the liquidation of democracy into a 'plutocracy' of and by the 1% for the 0.01%. Along with the decades of neo-liberal policies drastically enforcing the 'Powell memorandum', this has helped not only create grotesque inequality, but turned millions of people, mostly men, into alcohol and opiod addicts, and raised the American suicide rate by some 25% across the board. So while this tempest rages, these matters remain mostly untouched, with Trump betraying the tens of millions who voted for him, and quietly advancing these problems, which bear no comparison to the alleged attempted sexual assault on a teenage girl by a couple of drunken boys at a college party (decades ago, to boot). While all eyes are focussed here, the far more relevant story of how the Trump administration may be moving to war-like measures against Iran with its actions in Basra, abetted by other Israeli claims about Iran, also remains on the sidelines.

One hell of a conspiracy theory

https://nomoregames.net/…/flying-a-boeing-767-piece-of-cake/ As we may recall, although it was a while ago, back in September 2001 - that '9/11' was carried out by Muslim hijackers who trained at flight schools in Florida and California (?). Well those schools must have had Boeing 767s for them to train on...? Surely....? Boeing must lend its major passenger airliners to such schools..... but any Hollywood or James Bond movie shows such schools providing training on tiny planes, carrying perhaps the trainee pilot and the teacher. Yet the question that no one in the official news media asked is how did those 'Muslims' go from being trained on a tiny plane, to immediately taking control of sophisticated giant airliners and fly them with deadly accuracy into buildings....? Can we learn to drive a car with a 'G' license, and simply stride into a giant truck and drive it to wherever? I would have thought that impossible. But what do I know? Here's how flying a Boeing 767 is shown to be a mere 'piece of cake'. So shame on those airline pilots who have undergone scores of hours of training in the classroom and in the cockpit (of a 767...), before being allowed to fly a 767. What a joke, when the job is so eee-zzy. Professor David Ray Griffin's (of Claremont University in California) many books - New Pearl Harbour, Debunking 9/11 Myth Debunking (that's right - he totally debunked the BS the US government came up with after polls showed close to half of all Americans believe 9/11 was an 'inside job', (aka a 'false-flag operation' - done many times before by America to justify its wars against the Philippines back in 1899 or so, Mexico and more recently Vietnam)), and so on - decimate the official story of the US government; and prove it was an inside job carried out to provide the pretext for invading Iraq (home to the second largest oil reserves in the ME) and Afghanistan (home to many essential minerals, but also the pathway through which pipelines must pass). And yes, there are scores - more than a hundred - such impossibilities in the US government's story of 9/11. As Professor Griffin shows it is the official US government coverup that is the real conspiracy 'theory'. Or rather conspiracy 'fiction'. But when there is a wider 'conspiracy of silence' which refuses to consider the real evidence, that real evidence which proves a completely different conspiracy with perpetrators within the W. Bush administration, then the lies become accepted without examination of the evidence. Then there is the fact that normal security by the US airforce had been ordered to stand down. Why? Because on that very day, the US government was conducting simulations of attacks identical to the ones that were allegedly carried out! For example, there is AE911 - representing hundreds of American architects and engineers who challenge the official explanation of how Building 7 collapsed. Most people are not even aware that there was a third tower - 47 storeys tall - which collapsed in hours though no 'airplane' struck it. The official US government finding, or rather 'conspiracy', is that debris falling from the 2 principal towers which were allegedly struck by hijacked airliners, and which turned into dust within hours - something that hundreds of architects and engineers say is impossible - caused the third tower to turn to dust and collapse into its own footprint within hours, classic planned demolition style. Two impossibilities - that the 2 main towers could have metastasized into dust within hours from airplane fuel. And secondly that a third tower - also a massive steel-frame building - could collapse on its own footprint in classic planned demolition style - within hours because of debris from the 2 main towers. There is a long video on youtube by Dr. Judy Wood, who provides powerful evidence that the 3 buildings were laced with a top-secret US army material - nanothermite - which turned the steel frame into dust - and kept fires burning for weeks. Naturally there are plenty of people who dismiss it as 'lies'. And the report that Mayor Giuliani had some 120+ truckloads of debris from the towers carted away and sold or destroyed within hours of the event, likewise receives no official attention. What was this if not destruction of the evidence? Professor Griffin also talks about many things that were simply disregarded by the US government 'investigation'; which ought perhaps to be called the 'New Warren Commission' report. Things like multiple reports and testimony by many onlookers and firefighters that they heard explosions in the buildings after and before the 'airliners' struck. And there is the absence of a single official government video from the 'most photographed building on the planet' (the Pentagon) which shows bodies, baggage, debris, fuselage, or the practically indestructible jet engines, which would have resulted if a hijacked airliner had struck it. There are actually over 80 videos including from a gas-station across from the Pentagon, which were seized by the FBI back then, but NOT ONE has been released, for obvious reasons - they would decimate the American government's conspiracy theory. Or rather conspiracy 'fiction'. The only available footage on youtube shows a single hole - caused most likely by a cruise missile - which is what the white tube-like object travelling at high speed at ground level almost certainly is - from the only video of the event photographed by a member of the public. At the time, that missile reportedly killed 125 members of the US government investigating the disappearance of $2.3 trillion from the Pentagon, also eviscerating all the files and evidence. In December 2017, forbes.com reported that 2400 auditors were investigating the disappearance of $21 trillion, or $21,000 billion, from the Pentagon. Something was rotten in the state of Denmark. A lot more is rotten in the greatest 'shit-hole' on the planet.