THE TERRORISM OF AIR FORCE BOMBINGS

A rose by any other name would smell as sweet. A bomb by any other name would be just as deadly. Terrorism, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.

But to the trained puppies of the North American media, this is not so. They see only the 'terror' caused by say, suicide bombs......they do not see the TERROR caused by bombing raids of the air-forces of the US, UK, Israel..... even blatantly criminal invasions against the will of the international community are reported as 'wars'..... like the 'war' in Iraq...

But let me ask these puppies, who parrot the lies of their political masters - if they were victims of a bomb - if their lives or limbs were being ripped apart by a bomb - would it make a difference whether it was a suicide bomb or a bomb delivered from the air by an attacking air-force bomber?

Would they feel less agony, terror, anguish if it were the latter? Does the fear and pain increase when it is a suicide-bomb?

The answer to this obviously rhetorical question should be no.....but there is one important difference in the two cases discussed here - one of SCALE.... the SCALE of TERROR is incomparably GREATER when it is an air-force raid..... while the following claim depends partly on the size of the payloads carried by the attacking bombers, is it not the case that a thousand suicide bombers could not hope to match the devastation caused by a single attack by a bomber squadron?

People use sucide-bombs because they lack other options - such as air-forces and armies, and other WMD - which certain nations control(like the US which spends half the planet's budget on 'defence' - i.e. WMD) .... and because there is little justice in the criminal realities of the international political arena, where outlaw nations rule like Mafiosos...