One hell of a conspiracy theory

https://nomoregames.net/…/flying-a-boeing-767-piece-of-cake/ As we may recall, although it was a while ago, back in September 2001 - that '9/11' was carried out by Muslim hijackers who trained at flight schools in Florida and California (?). Well those schools must have had Boeing 767s for them to train on...? Surely....? Boeing must lend its major passenger airliners to such schools..... but any Hollywood or James Bond movie shows such schools providing training on tiny planes, carrying perhaps the trainee pilot and the teacher. Yet the question that no one in the official news media asked is how did those 'Muslims' go from being trained on a tiny plane, to immediately taking control of sophisticated giant airliners and fly them with deadly accuracy into buildings....? Can we learn to drive a car with a 'G' license, and simply stride into a giant truck and drive it to wherever? I would have thought that impossible. But what do I know? Here's how flying a Boeing 767 is shown to be a mere 'piece of cake'. So shame on those airline pilots who have undergone scores of hours of training in the classroom and in the cockpit (of a 767...), before being allowed to fly a 767. What a joke, when the job is so eee-zzy. Professor David Ray Griffin's (of Claremont University in California) many books - New Pearl Harbour, Debunking 9/11 Myth Debunking (that's right - he totally debunked the BS the US government came up with after polls showed close to half of all Americans believe 9/11 was an 'inside job', (aka a 'false-flag operation' - done many times before by America to justify its wars against the Philippines back in 1899 or so, Mexico and more recently Vietnam)), and so on - decimate the official story of the US government; and prove it was an inside job carried out to provide the pretext for invading Iraq (home to the second largest oil reserves in the ME) and Afghanistan (home to many essential minerals, but also the pathway through which pipelines must pass). And yes, there are scores - more than a hundred - such impossibilities in the US government's story of 9/11. As Professor Griffin shows it is the official US government coverup that is the real conspiracy 'theory'. Or rather conspiracy 'fiction'. But when there is a wider 'conspiracy of silence' which refuses to consider the real evidence, that real evidence which proves a completely different conspiracy with perpetrators within the W. Bush administration, then the lies become accepted without examination of the evidence. Then there is the fact that normal security by the US airforce had been ordered to stand down. Why? Because on that very day, the US government was conducting simulations of attacks identical to the ones that were allegedly carried out! For example, there is AE911 - representing hundreds of American architects and engineers who challenge the official explanation of how Building 7 collapsed. Most people are not even aware that there was a third tower - 47 storeys tall - which collapsed in hours though no 'airplane' struck it. The official US government finding, or rather 'conspiracy', is that debris falling from the 2 principal towers which were allegedly struck by hijacked airliners, and which turned into dust within hours - something that hundreds of architects and engineers say is impossible - caused the third tower to turn to dust and collapse into its own footprint within hours, classic planned demolition style. Two impossibilities - that the 2 main towers could have metastasized into dust within hours from airplane fuel. And secondly that a third tower - also a massive steel-frame building - could collapse on its own footprint in classic planned demolition style - within hours because of debris from the 2 main towers. There is a long video on youtube by Dr. Judy Wood, who provides powerful evidence that the 3 buildings were laced with a top-secret US army material - nanothermite - which turned the steel frame into dust - and kept fires burning for weeks. Naturally there are plenty of people who dismiss it as 'lies'. And the report that Mayor Giuliani had some 120+ truckloads of debris from the towers carted away and sold or destroyed within hours of the event, likewise receives no official attention. What was this if not destruction of the evidence? Professor Griffin also talks about many things that were simply disregarded by the US government 'investigation'; which ought perhaps to be called the 'New Warren Commission' report. Things like multiple reports and testimony by many onlookers and firefighters that they heard explosions in the buildings after and before the 'airliners' struck. And there is the absence of a single official government video from the 'most photographed building on the planet' (the Pentagon) which shows bodies, baggage, debris, fuselage, or the practically indestructible jet engines, which would have resulted if a hijacked airliner had struck it. There are actually over 80 videos including from a gas-station across from the Pentagon, which were seized by the FBI back then, but NOT ONE has been released, for obvious reasons - they would decimate the American government's conspiracy theory. Or rather conspiracy 'fiction'. The only available footage on youtube shows a single hole - caused most likely by a cruise missile - which is what the white tube-like object travelling at high speed at ground level almost certainly is - from the only video of the event photographed by a member of the public. At the time, that missile reportedly killed 125 members of the US government investigating the disappearance of $2.3 trillion from the Pentagon, also eviscerating all the files and evidence. In December 2017, forbes.com reported that 2400 auditors were investigating the disappearance of $21 trillion, or $21,000 billion, from the Pentagon. Something was rotten in the state of Denmark. A lot more is rotten in the greatest 'shit-hole' on the planet.