SENT TO THE SUN AND THE STAR
Jews have been the victims of centuries-old persecution by peoples imagining themselves Christian but who were the exact opposite of what the 'Son of Man' taught. Priests and some Popes over the centuries encouraged this victimization, and if the Son of Man had been alive during these events, it is hard to see how such priests and Popes (and those untold millions following their wicked preachings) would not have been labelled 'hypocrites', murderers, and 'sons of the devil' by that Son. This persecution of Jewry reached its zenith under Nazism.
It is important however to place this persecution in perspective. Jews have now acquired a seemingly 'untouchable' status as no one in our Western establishment seems willing to tolerate any criticism of Jewish behavior. The 'holocaust' is one such untouchable subject and anyone who does not join in the lament is denounced as an 'holocaust-denier'.
But the Jewish holocaust is far from the only one – it is not even the most horrendous one. History contains far worse holocausts and genocides which are effectively being 'denied' by the mainstream Western establishment in their zeal to prove their loyalty to Jewish memory.
During the Second World War in which some six million Jews were killed by Nazis, some 27 million Soviets perished as well, bearing the brunt of the terrible Nazi war-machine, while the Western Allies watched and waited, before launching D-Day to finish off the mortally wounded Nazi behemoth.
Going back further, even greater holocausts took place in North and South America. According to the Oscar-winning film 'Barbarian Invasions' (directed by Canada's Denys Arcand) some 50 million natives were murdered in North America and three times as many in South America. In the latter case this mind-boggling genocide took place without modern 'weapons of mass destruction', and with the complicity of the Roman Catholic Church. (More reliable sources such as the writings of Ronald Wright attribute most of the latter genocide to diseases (smallpox, flu, measles, etc.) brought to Latin America by the Europeans.... a kind of unwitting biological warfare.)
In the recent news flaps involving the Wiesenthal Center's denunciation of the current Pope for reinstating an alleged holocaust-denying priest, and others involving denunciations of dissident columnists who have compared Israel's actions in Gaza and others prior to it to those of the Nazis, we need to remember that the Jews have not been the only victims of human cruelty and insanity. They have not even been the worst victims.
And in any event, what was done to Jews by the Nazis does not justify their theft of Palestinian land and the use of American-supported force to deny the 'legitimate rights of the Palestinian people', who none of the 'right people' in the Western establishment seem to care about.
Israel's treatment of the Palestinians who they evicted from their homeland is an obscenity, and that central fact should not be forgotten in the Jewish lobbying and denunciations of anyone who dares criticize Israeli actions in the Middle East. If 'Yahweh' promised the Jews some miles of burning desert, He conned them, for those few miles are not the 'promised land'. And they have violated all His commandments in their armed robbery and occupation of the 'Holy Land'.
Thursday, January 29, 2009
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
LETTER TO THE POST - THE RIGHT TO NOT SUPPORT
THE RIGHT TO NOT SUPPORT
Mr. Gunter's editorial critiquing the Ontario Superior Court judgment in the Pasqualino Cornelio case ordering him to continue paying child support to his ex-wife for twin girls fathered by someone else without Mr. Cornelio's knowledge makes the right argument, but too timidly. Mr. Gunter also avoids the major under-currents of Canadian society of which family law is but one part....it is not just in the arena of family law that 'logic is distorted'. And the problem goes far beyond 'distorted logic' to a almost inexorable bias against men in many aspects of society where 'logic' fairness and justice have been aborted to appease extreme male-hating feminist ideology.
Mr. Gunter avoids this 'dangerous' subject to make his article politically palatable. This is understandable, although he does refer to the 'hue and cry' that would occur if a woman were 'press-ganged' by a judge to pay a father child support for children out of wedlock....
Mr. Gunter for example, dilutes his argument by ending his article by saying a man who did not support children fathered by another, would be a 'heel'. But he does not say what a woman who commits adultery and has kids out of wedlock, in flagrant deceit of marital vows, would be.........surely even prostitutes behave more morally, and contractually?
The problem in our post-feminist society is that 'the woman is always right'. Women are never guilty of misconduct – if they 'maliciously' wound their husbands, it is because they are suffering from 'battered woman's syndrome'; if they manufacture allegations of sexual abuse against their ex-husbands to have custody denied to them, that is of no consequence; if they manufacture allegations of rape or sexual harassment, that is simply 'mischief'; if a wife is sleeping with someone else, surely that is the husband's failure to keep her happy and satisfied.........men are only 'deadbeats', wallets...moneybags, who have no moral qualities as they only want 'one thing'.... they are therefore to be presumed guilty as charged, no evidence necessary. The heinous and automatic guilt of men necessitates draconian laws and medieval policies such as 'zero tolerance'.
There are never any consequences for female students who destroy the careers of male teachers with false allegations......in domestic disputes, it is always the man who must be charged with a crime, never the woman.....in a rape case, a woman's previous sexual history cannot now be discussed......no is always no to our idiot system, even though any fool knows that no is usually only a woman's first position, to immediately gain and maintain the upper hand in sexual negotiations, and be changed as the situation dictates, for women must not appear 'easy', or forward.....Women are always the prey, never the pursuers...they never lust, only love...they never use their 'pussy-power' to extract, even extort, the maximum price (emotional and financial) from men....no..they are too kind and loving for that.....The tommyrot just does not end.....but in the Land of the Eunuch, the Home of the John Bobbitt, tommyrot is official policy.
These matters constitute more than 'distorted logic' – they amount to systematic (and quite hideous) corruption by a system that has sold out men to feminist ideology, and idiotology. Some decades ago, an early feminist wrote of the 'female eunuch'......we are long now into an era where male eunuchs and John Bobbitts abound.
Mr. Gunter's editorial critiquing the Ontario Superior Court judgment in the Pasqualino Cornelio case ordering him to continue paying child support to his ex-wife for twin girls fathered by someone else without Mr. Cornelio's knowledge makes the right argument, but too timidly. Mr. Gunter also avoids the major under-currents of Canadian society of which family law is but one part....it is not just in the arena of family law that 'logic is distorted'. And the problem goes far beyond 'distorted logic' to a almost inexorable bias against men in many aspects of society where 'logic' fairness and justice have been aborted to appease extreme male-hating feminist ideology.
Mr. Gunter avoids this 'dangerous' subject to make his article politically palatable. This is understandable, although he does refer to the 'hue and cry' that would occur if a woman were 'press-ganged' by a judge to pay a father child support for children out of wedlock....
Mr. Gunter for example, dilutes his argument by ending his article by saying a man who did not support children fathered by another, would be a 'heel'. But he does not say what a woman who commits adultery and has kids out of wedlock, in flagrant deceit of marital vows, would be.........surely even prostitutes behave more morally, and contractually?
The problem in our post-feminist society is that 'the woman is always right'. Women are never guilty of misconduct – if they 'maliciously' wound their husbands, it is because they are suffering from 'battered woman's syndrome'; if they manufacture allegations of sexual abuse against their ex-husbands to have custody denied to them, that is of no consequence; if they manufacture allegations of rape or sexual harassment, that is simply 'mischief'; if a wife is sleeping with someone else, surely that is the husband's failure to keep her happy and satisfied.........men are only 'deadbeats', wallets...moneybags, who have no moral qualities as they only want 'one thing'.... they are therefore to be presumed guilty as charged, no evidence necessary. The heinous and automatic guilt of men necessitates draconian laws and medieval policies such as 'zero tolerance'.
There are never any consequences for female students who destroy the careers of male teachers with false allegations......in domestic disputes, it is always the man who must be charged with a crime, never the woman.....in a rape case, a woman's previous sexual history cannot now be discussed......no is always no to our idiot system, even though any fool knows that no is usually only a woman's first position, to immediately gain and maintain the upper hand in sexual negotiations, and be changed as the situation dictates, for women must not appear 'easy', or forward.....Women are always the prey, never the pursuers...they never lust, only love...they never use their 'pussy-power' to extract, even extort, the maximum price (emotional and financial) from men....no..they are too kind and loving for that.....The tommyrot just does not end.....but in the Land of the Eunuch, the Home of the John Bobbitt, tommyrot is official policy.
These matters constitute more than 'distorted logic' – they amount to systematic (and quite hideous) corruption by a system that has sold out men to feminist ideology, and idiotology. Some decades ago, an early feminist wrote of the 'female eunuch'......we are long now into an era where male eunuchs and John Bobbitts abound.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)