The flogging of Djokovic and other disturbing questions

Since the onset of the current pandemic, many disturbing questions about it have been suppressed, either covertly or overtly. Chief among them was the banning of David Icke, a self-described 'conspiracy theorist' - from youtube and facebook - for his claims that there is no certain virus definition (hence the burning of some 5G towers), that statistics of deaths are being manipulated (with co-morbidities falsely attributed to the coronavirus), and the presumed intent by billionaires like Bill Gates (who is now the largest funder of W.H.O.) to plant nano-chips in vaccines which are likely to become mandatory or carry consequences for those who resist (like restrictions on travel). That nanoparticles are being researched for use in vaccines and nano-medicine is an open secret, easily googled, with benefits such as new limbs, repairing damaged nerves etc. being positive possibilities. But none of this is openly stated. The WTA, including Canada's Eugenie Bouchard, mocked Novak Djokovic since his Adria tournoi (done without distancing), resulted in him and others testing positive. What is not mentioned is whether Novak or any other affected person, such as his coach Ivanesivic, actually suffer any symptoms post diagnosis. Isn't that a relevant question? Yes theoretically these people could 'infect' others.... but if most of those others suffer no symptoms, is there harm or benefit? The only way to acquire immunity is exposure - either direct infection or through vaccine. We are told without vaccination the death count would be vastly greater. But therein lies the dilemma..... should the focus be on natural herd immunity, or dependency on Big Pharma vaccines? The Gates foundation openly prefers the latter, and has a record of pressuring the poorest in Africa to serve as guinea pigs, with some disastrous consequences. But the billionaire's wealth and current neo-liberal corruption is likely to protect him from consequences, both civil and criminal. And the as yet undiscussed $6.4 trillion dollar question, and potentially a $64 trillion dollar question if pandemics (real or manipulated) become a future trend - is why is a set of private, undisclosed hyper-rich bankers (called banksters by former Canadian Clerk of the Privy Council Paul Hellyer) - have the license to create from thin (if polluted) air, these trillions of dollars being 'borrowed' by governments around the world? Almost certainly they include the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers.... And why should citizens, including Canadians - have to pay back such fictitious money - through vastly increased taxes or slashed programs? Isn't this just another grotesque and monstrous money grab by the hyper-rich, from the 99%?